Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice problem.

Data differ considerably on the number of medical errors that happen in the United States. Some studies position the number of medical errors in excess of one million annually while other research studies position the number as low as a couple of hundred thousand. It is extensively accepted however that iatrogenic illness (illness or injury triggered by a medical mistake or medical treatment) is the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States after heart problem and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As an attorney who has restricted his practice to representation of victims injured by another person's negligence, medical or otherwise, I have actually gotten countless calls from potential clients over the last 20 years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Since medical malpractice litigation is extremely costly and extremely drawn-out the attorneys in our firm are really careful exactly what medical malpractice cases in which we decide to get involved. It is not unusual for a lawyer, or law office to advance lawsuits expenditures in excess of $100,000.00 just to obtain a case to trial. These expenditures are the expenses related to pursuing the lawsuits that include skilled witness fees, deposition expenses, exhibit preparation and court expenses. What follows is an outline of the concerns, questions and factors to consider that the attorneys in our firm consider when discussing with a client a potential medical malpractice case.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Standard of Care" for medical physicians (or nurses, chiropractic practitioners, dental professionals, podiatric doctors and so on.) which results in an injury or death. "Requirement of Care" suggests medical treatment that a sensible, prudent medical provider in the very same community should offer. The majority of cases include a dispute over what the suitable standard of care is. The standard of care is typically offered through making use of professional testament from seeking advice from doctors that practice or teach medication in the very same specialty as the accused( s).

When did the malpractice occur (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of restrictions is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the defendant treated the plaintiff (victim) or the date the complainant found or fairly should have found the malpractice. Some states have a two year statute of limitations. In Ohio if the victim is a minor the statute of constraints will not even begin to run till the minor becomes 18 years of ages. Be advised however derivative claims for parents might run several years earlier. If you think you may have a case it is important you contact an attorney soon. Regardless of the statute of limitations, doctors transfer, witnesses vanish and memories fade. The earlier counsel is engaged the sooner crucial proof can be preserved and the much better your possibilities are of prevailing.

Exactly what did visit the up coming document or cannot do?

Simply since a client does not have a successful result from a surgery, medical procedure or medical treatment does not in and of itself mean the doctor slipped up. Medical practice is by no indicates a warranty of good health or a complete healing. The majority of the time when a patient experiences a not successful result from medical treatment it is not due to the fact that the medical service provider made a mistake. The majority of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is despite excellent, quality treatment not because of sub-standard treatment.

3 Things You Should Consider Before Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer

Personal injury law functions to help clients and their families receive the compensation and justice they deserve. Unfortunately, civil litigation is not always so cut and dry. Whether it be a case of intent or negligence, it’s crucial that you choose a personal injury best suited for your individual case. Here are 3 things to consider before hiring a personal injury lawyer: 3 Things You Should Consider Before Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer

When talking about a possible case with a customer it is essential that the client have the ability to inform us why they think there was medical neglect. As we all know people frequently die from cancer, cardiovascular disease or organ failure even with great medical care. However, we likewise understand that individuals typically need to not pass away from knee surgical treatment, appendix removal, hernia repair work or some other "minor" surgery. When something really unanticipated like that occurs it certainly deserves exploring whether there was a medical mistake. If in doubt most medical malpractice legal representatives will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Many attorneys do not charge for a preliminary assessment in neglect cases.

So what if there was a medical mistake (near cause)?

In any negligence case not just is the burden of proof on the complainant to prove the medical malpractice the plaintiff need to likewise show that as a direct outcome of the medical negligence some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Given that medical malpractice lawsuits is so expensive to pursue the injuries must be considerable to warrant progressing with the case. All medical errors are "malpractice" however only a small percentage of errors generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a parent takes his boy to the emergency room after a skateboard accident and the ER medical professional doesn't do x-rays in spite of an apparent bend in the kid's lower arm and tells the dad his boy has "just a sprain" this likely is medical malpractice. However, if the kid is appropriately detected within a couple of days and makes a complete recovery it is not likely the "damages" are serious adequate to carry out a suit that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being appropriately diagnosed, the young boy needs to have his arm re-broken and the development plate is irreparably damaged due to the delay then the damages likely would warrant additional investigation and a possible lawsuit.

Other essential considerations.

Other concerns that are essential when figuring out whether a client has a malpractice case consist of the victim's habits and case history. Did do anything to trigger or add to the bad medical outcome? A typical method of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the client. If it is a birth injury case, did the mama have proper prenatal care, did she smoke or use drugs throughout her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the doctor's orders, keep his appointments, take his medication as instructed and tell the doctor the reality? These are truths that we need to understand in order to identify whether the physician will have a valid defense to the malpractice suit?

What occurs if it looks like there is a case?

If it appears that the patient may have been a victim of a medical mistake, the medical error caused a considerable injury or death and the patient was certified with his physician's orders, then we have to get the patient's medical records. In many cases, getting the medical records includes nothing more mailing a release signed by the customer to the doctor and/or medical facility along with a letter requesting the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an executor of the victims estate has to be appointed in the regional county court of probate and then the administrator can sign the release requesting the records.

As soon as the records are received we evaluate them to make sure they are complete. It is not uncommon in medical carelessness cases to get insufficient medical charts. When all the appropriate records are acquired they are provided to a certified medical specialist for evaluation and viewpoint. If the case is against an emergency room medical professional we have an emergency room physician examine the case, if it's against a cardiologist we need to get a viewpoint from a cardiologist, etc

. Mostly, exactly what would like to know form the specialist is 1) was the medical care supplied listed below the requirement of care, 2) did the infraction of the requirement of care result in the clients injury or death? If the doctors opinion agrees with on both counts a claim will be prepared on the customer's behalf and generally submitted in the court of typical pleas in the county where the malpractice was committed or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited circumstances jurisdiction for the malpractice claim could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, a good malpractice lawyer will thoroughly and completely examine any prospective malpractice case prior to submitting a claim. It's not fair to the victim or the physicians to file a suit unless the professional tells us that he thinks there is a strong basis to bring the claim. Due to the expense of pursuing a medical neglect action no good lawyer has the time or resources to squander on a "pointless suit."

When talking to a malpractice lawyer it is very important to accurately give the attorney as much information as possible and address the lawyer's questions as completely as possible. Prior to talking with think about making some notes so you always remember some essential reality or circumstance the attorney might need.

Finally, if you think you might have a malpractice case contact an excellent malpractice lawyer as soon as possible so there are no statute of restrictions problems in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *